Ir al contenido principal

Entrevista de Frank Ocean para GQ


Se me hizo raro ver en el mi correo una notificación de una entrevista a Frank Ocean. Pero fue algo sutil. Como una disonancia cognitiva. Poco a poco entendí: Frank Ocean no da entrevistas tan seguido.

Fragmento que me estimula a parafrasear a Frank:

VEGYN: With that in mind, do you think there's any misconceptions people might have about you that you're trying to confront? 
OCEAN: I feel like between the numbers of zero to ten, in between every number there's infinity, you know? I would describe a person as the space between the symbols, beyond the language. That dissonance—the word being a big container for what I was feeling…the way I was seen was not even close to correct. It's still not correct, either. 
With some pop stars, the idea of them is maybe more balanced or fully formed: a half-dozen magazine covers, x amount of interviews, a daily influx of media. There's a way you wanna be in the visual press, although you could potentially be misrepresented; when you're completely minimal with media, there's a lot of pressure on whatever one thing you're doing, the stakes are higher. Social media helps that, 'cause you're fully in control and can message that how you want.

La entrevista es parte de la renovación de GQ en Estados Unidos.

Al mismo tiempo me enteré que hay un nuevo editor-in-chief en GQ. Tiene una carta/manifiesto para la nueva época que presidirá Will Welch.

Con lo que Welch cierra su carta y abre su era:
This new iteration of GQ might not be for everyone. But especially in this niche-driven era, if you try to be everything to everyone, you end up not being much of anything to anyone. So we're making GQ less a big tent and more the only place to go when you want a rich, intelligent, and transportive plunge into all the stylishness the world has to offer. Times have changed, but isn't that what GQ has always been about? I think so. Let's dive in.

Links: Frank Ocean on Making His Instagram Public, His Skin-Care Routine, and Moving to NYC | GQ || Welcome to a Whole New Era of GQ | GQ

Entradas más populares de este blog

Las masculinidades tóxicas en el caso de Dana Lizeth

Antes que nada, me uno a la familia y al círculo cercano de Dana Lizeth en la pena por la que atraviesan actualmente. No hay palabras que hagan justicia al dolor por el que están atravesando.

En la lectura reciente que he hecho de un drama griego, me encuentro el diálogo que abre este video:

—No hay bestia más dura de vencer que la mujer,
ni el fuego ni la cruel pantera se la comparan.

—¿Por qué me atacas expresando contra mí esos pensamientos
siéndote posible, desgraciado, tener en mí una fiel aliada?

—¡Porque nunca dejaré de odiar a las mujeres!

Lo anterior es Aristófanes.

Unos días después del asesinato de Dana Lizeth, y luego de escribir algo respecto a ella y de las acciones propias de cretinos que realizaron las autoridades local y estatal, pensé que no tenía nada más que decir.

El gobierno local puso lámparas en el parque donde Dana Lizeth fue asesinada; la Fiscalía emitió en las 24 horas posteriores al homicidio de Dana Lizeth estadísticas halagüeñas de localización de mujeres.

(A…

Si no sabes usar TikTok, eres ya un senecto iletrado digital

Me sentí viejo cuando intenté usar Snapchat y darme cuenta que me costaba trabajo entenderle. Así que por ello no me gustó tanto.

TikTok (previamente Musical.ly) quiso entrar en mí. Tuve varios followers, adolescentes. Pero nunca canté o hice algo en esa plataforma.

Pero al no entender algo, somos más vulnerables en Internet:
This means the very people who struggle the most with digital information and technology risk being left to fend for themselves in an environment where they’re being targeted and exploited precisely because of their vulnerabilities.
What An Aging Population Means For The Future Of The Internet

¿Por qué la pérdida de 50 millones de canciones de MySpace es importante?

Tomado del newsletter de MusicREDEF:

Whether MYSPACE lost as many as 50 million user-uploaded songs through its own incompetence or simply dumped them, as more than a few internet pundits believe, is somewhat beside the point. Whether you were aware, until a day or two ago, that MySpace still existed is similarly unimportant. Let's put notions of quality aside as well. Maybe a few of those 50 million songs were as good as the 10,000th-best song currently residing on SOUNDCLOUD and maybe they weren't, but that's not for me, you or MySpace to decide. What matters today is that as many as 50 million songs are gone and that a website that, for better or worse, still wants you to share and entrust your memories with it is responsible for losing them. And having apparently had as long as a year to think of a way to explain itself, the site had exactly this to say: "We apologize for the inconvenience and suggest that you retain your backup copies.” Seriously. A corporate com…